SAFER Banking Act Stalls Again: Why Cannabis Companies Still Can't Get a Bank Account
Advertisement
Table of Contents
- The Banking Crisis That Won't Go Away
- What Happened to SAFER Banking?
- The Daily Reality of Unbanked Cannabis
- Will Rescheduling Solve the Problem?
- Who's Filling the Gap?
- What Comes Next
- The Bottom Line
The Banking Crisis That Won't Go Away
For an industry generating billions in annual revenue, legal cannabis in America operates with a staggering handicap: most businesses still cannot open a basic bank account. In 2026, despite operating legally in 24 states with adult-use markets and 38 with medical programs, cannabis companies remain financial pariahs at the nation's largest banks.
The SAFER Banking Act — the Secure and Fair Enforcement Regulation Banking Act — was supposed to fix this. It passed the Senate Banking Committee with a bipartisan 14–9 vote in 2024, showing rare cross-party support. But under the new Republican-controlled 119th Congress, the legislation has gone cold, and cannabis operators are feeling the consequences every single day.
What Happened to SAFER Banking?
The SAFER Banking Act evolved from the original SAFE Banking Act [Quick Definition: Federal bill that would let banks serve cannabis businesses without fear of prosecution], which passed the House seven times between 2019 and 2023. The upgraded version added provisions for financial services beyond basic checking accounts, including merchant processing, insurance, and advertising services for state-legal marijuana businesses.
The bill's momentum crumbled when Republicans took control of both chambers. Senator Tim Scott of South Carolina, a longtime cannabis banking opponent, now chairs the Senate Banking Committee — the same committee that previously advanced the legislation. Senate Majority Leader John Thune has also expressed opposition to cannabis banking reform.
Neither chamber has reintroduced the SAFER Banking Act or similar legislation in the current Congress. The result is a status quo that forces an industry with an estimated $47 billion in annual sales to operate in a financial gray zone.
The Daily Reality of Unbanked Cannabis
The consequences of operating without reliable banking access are more severe than most consumers realize. Dispensaries handle enormous volumes of cash daily, making them targets for robbery and creating serious employee safety concerns. Michigan's recent 964-pound marijuana bust highlighted how the black market thrives partly because legal operators face banking barriers that underground sellers don't worry about.
Beyond physical safety, the lack of banking access inflates operational costs dramatically. Cannabis businesses that do find banking partners — typically through smaller community banks and credit unions — pay significantly higher fees than other industries. Monthly account maintenance fees can run $2,000 to $5,000, compared to hundreds of dollars for traditional businesses.
Payment processing remains another pain point. While some cannabis companies have found workarounds through cashless ATM systems and proprietary payment apps, these solutions often operate in regulatory gray areas. Consumers at dispensaries across the country still encounter the awkward reality of paying cash or using non-standard payment methods for perfectly legal purchases.
Will Rescheduling Solve the Problem?
There's a widespread misconception that marijuana rescheduling from Schedule I to Schedule III [Quick Definition: A mid-level federal drug classification including ketamine and testosterone] would solve the banking crisis. It wouldn't — at least not directly.
President Trump signed an executive order directing federal agencies to initiate the reclassification process, and prediction market traders put the odds of rescheduling happening by year-end at roughly even. But rescheduling to Schedule III does not equal legalization. Cannabis would still be a controlled substance requiring a prescription, and most major banks view any federally controlled substance proceeds as carrying significant compliance risk.
Industry attorneys and banking compliance officers are clear on this point: rescheduling alone will not open the floodgates to mainstream banking. Without explicit safe harbor protections — exactly what the SAFER Banking Act would provide — the nation's largest financial institutions will remain on the sidelines.
The one area where rescheduling could help is tax relief. Moving cannabis to Schedule III would eliminate the application of IRS Section 280E [Quick Definition: IRS code barring cannabis businesses from deducting normal expenses like rent and payroll], which currently prevents cannabis businesses from deducting most operating expenses. That tax savings could be significant, but it doesn't address the fundamental banking access problem.
Who's Filling the Gap?
With major banks still unwilling to serve the cannabis industry, a patchwork of smaller financial institutions has stepped up. Credit unions in states like Oregon, Colorado, and Massachusetts have built cannabis-specific banking programs. Regional banks like Needham Bank have become key players, recently backing Verano Holdings' $195 million refinancing deal at a 9.5% interest rate.
Cannabis-focused financial technology companies have also emerged. These fintech platforms offer compliance monitoring, cashless payment processing, and banking-as-a-service solutions specifically designed for the industry. While these services fill a critical need, they come at premium prices that add to the already thin margins many cannabis operators face.
Thirty-two state attorneys general sent a letter to Congress urging passage of SAFER Banking, arguing that the current system actually undermines public safety by forcing legitimate businesses to handle large amounts of cash. Their plea highlighted how the banking void creates exactly the kind of problems — theft, money laundering, tax evasion — that opponents of cannabis legalization often cite.
What Comes Next
The path forward for cannabis banking reform in 2026 looks narrow but not entirely blocked. Several potential developments could shift the calculus.
The bipartisan CLIMB Act, recently introduced by Representatives Reschenthaler and Carter, would allow state-legal cannabis businesses to list on major stock exchanges like NYSE and Nasdaq. While not a direct banking solution, listing on public markets would normalize cannabis companies in the financial system and could pressure banks to follow.
Individual states are also taking action. Some have created state-chartered banking programs specifically for cannabis businesses, though these lack the federal protections that would make major banks comfortable.
For now, the cannabis industry's relationship with the American banking system remains one of the strangest paradoxes in modern commerce: a legal, regulated, multibillion-dollar industry that the financial system largely pretends doesn't exist.
The Bottom Line
The SAFER Banking Act's stall in 2026 means cannabis companies will continue operating with one hand tied behind their backs. Until Congress provides explicit legal protection for financial institutions that serve state-legal cannabis businesses, the industry will keep paying premium prices for basic financial services, handling more cash than any business should, and watching competitors in other legal industries enjoy financial tools they can only dream about.
The irony is that banking reform consistently polls as one of the most bipartisan cannabis issues in Washington. Lawmakers on both sides of the aisle acknowledge the public safety benefits of moving cannabis out of the cash economy. But in the current political configuration, acknowledgment hasn't translated into action — and cannabis companies are left paying the price.
Pull-Quote Suggestions:
"Regional banks like Needham Bank have become key players, recently backing Verano Holdings' $195 million refinancing deal at a 9.5% interest rate."
"The result is a status quo that forces an industry with an estimated $47 billion in annual sales to operate in a financial gray zone."
"For an industry generating billions in annual revenue, legal cannabis in America operates with a staggering handicap: most businesses still cannot open a basic bank account."
Why It Matters: The SAFER Banking Act has stalled under Republican leadership in 2026. Here's why cannabis businesses still can't access basic banking services.